🔗 Share this article

The beluga known as Jelly Bean’s daughter Bertie is an cute small “sweetheart”. Orion – nicknamed “Onion” – is a big but guardian-like companion. Another whale, Zephyr has “endless energy” and wiggles like a wiggly creature. Lillooet is the “most affectionate” with a gentle spirit.

Thirty enclosed marine mammals in a Canada-based entertainment facility have been entangled in a disagreement between a shuttered park, government authorities and welfare campaigners.

But those closest to the whales say the heated controversy over their destiny often fails to consider the individual traits of the whales who, after growing up in confinement, have been thoroughly researched by the people who work with them regularly.

After the national authorities blocked the export of the belugas to China, the embattled attraction near Niagara Falls where they are housed stated it would consider to end their lives unless the federal government funds the cost of keeping them alive. The nation’s fisheries minister has rejected that request, placing the 30 whales in an dangerously unstable circumstance.

Highly Cognitive Sea Creatures

Experts say that belugas’ neural makeup, along with their mimicry abilities, problem solving and group interactions point to they are deeply intelligent creatures – something one caretaker learned directly.

Burgess spent three years as a beluga trainer, a role that required gaining confidence of the aquatic animals.

“Establishing those connections over time takes a lot of consistency and a lot of care. At the start, they’re very cautious of you,” she said. “Eventually, you gain reciprocal understanding. And they start being more vulnerable with you. It’s just so extraordinary and fulfilling.”

The trainer knew the whales were exceptionally cognitive, but she says she was nonetheless amazed by the subtleties and quirks in their personalities. She cultivated a special affection for a pair of whales with contrasting temperaments.

“One whale selected me. Cleo demanded work,” she said. “They altered the way I understand connection.”

Public Concerns and Facility Decline

Her connection with the whales evolved against a context of increasing societal concern to their enclosure.

During her tenure at the park, seven belugas and the park’s one orca, Kiska, died. In total, nineteen belugas have perished at the park since recent years, a statistic which the park links to expected lifespan, but which activists say indicates the substandard environment in which they were maintained.

The facility did not open to the visitors over the summer, but the former trainer says she observed directly results of the shutdown. “Structural materials is falling apart from the enclosures because they’re falling apart and not being maintained. The whales are exploratory and so they grab fragments and swim around with chunks in their jaws. It’s distressing to see.”

The facility did not reply to a inquiry, but in the past stated: “The whales … get far better health care and constant attention than any person in the Britain, or anywhere else.”

Fate in Limbo and Potential Resolutions

The former employee was terminated from the facility in the spring following the death of Eos, an unwell beluga the employees had to put down. She said the park suspected details of the death were leaked to the news outlets and she was released soon after.

The ambiguity over the whales’ outcome has left Burgess and other caretakers in anguish. She says the facility’s ultimatum to euthanize its whales is a negotiation tactic and is a “logistically impossible” task, adding any attempts to put down even a one beluga would require “immense staff”, trucks and specialized tools.

“It cannot happen in hell the employees would ever do it,” she said.

She supports requests for the whales to be removed immediately from the facility, with its deteriorating pools and shrinking team.

In the autumn, the nation’s government official rejected a proposal to export the whales to an overseas location.

“To approve the application would have meant a perpetual situation in confinement and a reversion to public entertainment,” the official commented. “As society, we know that whales should be in the wild, not in pools for our enjoyment. I could not in clear conscience permit an relocation that would continue the situation these belugas have experienced.”

But the former trainer said the official’s statements reflect a broader incorrect perception of the circumstances of existence for belugas living their whole lives in enclosures.

“The people needs to understand these are whales that have spent their whole lives in enclosed habitats and they will need ongoing assistance for the foreseeable future,” she said. “Many just don’t understand that it’s not as easy as saying ‘shut it down’.”

Alternative Habitat and Ongoing Debate

As authorities struggle to find a answer, proposals have emerged, some of which have questionable practicality. One proposal called for the belugas to be freed into the open waters of Canada’s north – where whales are a primary resource of sustenance for Indigenous peoples.

A planned refuge in the region of Nova Scotia, which recently received official endorsement, has shown to be highly debated. The planned location, which includes a large area of enclosed sea water, is not yet built. Supporters remain optimistic that it could ultimately represent a permanent resolution for a number of the whales.

But, the former trainer says, among trainers she’s spoken with, there is “no trust there” about what she said is “simply an trial” in the whales’ future.

Others say the possibility of a refuge reflects a changing attitudes away from captive facilities and could represent a workable solution in the near future.

Charles Vinick, director of the initiative, said the site will replicate the mental engagement and feeding regimen the whales obtain from specialists, albeit in a significantly bigger area. He said after the medical condition of whales is thoroughly evaluated, which could take months|an extended period|